language: Deutsch   Français   italiano   Español   Português   日本語   russian   arabic   norwegian   swedish   danish   Nederlands   finland   ireland   English  

Sexual Harassment in the Workplace - The Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment | Australian Human Rights Commission complaint definition legal

Australian Human Rights Commission everyone, everywhere, everyday

Quick search form Search Social Media Main menu Home About Contact us Commissioners What are human rights? Subscribe Our legislation Corporate info Jobs Brochures - Know Your Rights Translations Tenders News Latest News Stories Media releases Alerts E-bulletin Photos Media contacts Videos Opinion Pieces Podrights Speeches Social Media Complaints Complaint guides Make a complaint Contact the National Information Service Conciliation Register Publications Our Work Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Age Discrimination Asylum Seekers and Refugees Children's Rights Disability Rights Family and Domestic Violence Race Discrimination Rights and Freedoms Sex Discrimination Sexuality, Sex & Gender Identity Legal International Education Teachers Students Early Childhood Education APS Human Rights Network Business Vocational Education and Training Human Rights Explained fact sheets Face the Facts Employers Good practice good business factsheets Toolkits, guidelines and other resources Business and human rights Join the network Get Involved Events list Human Rights Awards Events calendar Competitions RightsTalk Publications Age Asylum Seekers and Refugees Children's Rights Commission - General Disability Family and Domestic Violence Indigenous Legal Race Rights and Freedoms Sex Discrimination Sexual Orientation, Sex & Gender Identity Education Complaints You are here Home / Sexual Harassment in the Workplace - The Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment Subsection Title Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Justice Age Discrimination Asylum Seekers and Refugees Children's Rights Disability Rights Family and Domestic Violence Race Discrimination Rights and Freedoms Sex Discrimination Sexuality, Sex & Gender Identity Legal International Leave this field blank Sexual Harassment in the Workplace - The Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment Sexual Harassment in the Workplace - The Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment Media Pack Index || The Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment

The Legal Definition of Sexual Harassment Sexual harassment is an unwelcome sexual advance, unwelcome request for sexual favours or other unwelcome conduct of a sexual frzwfnqq. moncler mens t shirt sale nature which makes a person feel offended, humiliated and/or intimidated, where a reasonable person would anticipate that reaction in the circumstances.

The Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) defines the nature and circumstances in which sexual harassment is unlawful. It is also unlawful for a person to be victimised for making, or proposing to make, a complaint of sexual harassment to the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.

Examples of sexually harassing behaviour include:

unwelcome touching; staring or leering; suggestive comments or jokes; sexually explicit pictures or posters; unwanted invitations to go out on dates; requests for sex; intrusive questions about a person's private life or body; unnecessary familiarity, such as deliberately brushing up against a person; insults or taunts based on sex; sexually explicit physical contact; and sexually explicit emails or SMS text messages. A working environment or workplace culture that is sexually permeated or hostile will also amount to unlawful sexual harassment. Some of the factors emerging from the case law which may indicate a potentially hostile environment include the display of obscene or pornographic materials, general sexual banter, crude conversation or innuendo and offensive jokes. See 1.2.4 of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Code of Practice for Employers for further information.

The Sex Discrimination Act makes sexual harassment unlawful in many areas of public life, including in employment situations, educational institutions, the provision of goods, services and accommodation and the administration of Commonwealth laws or programs.

A person who sexually harasses is primarily responsible for the sexual harassment under the Sex Discrimination Act. However, in many cases, employers and others can be held responsible under the Sex Discrimination Act for acts of sexual harassment done by their employers or agents. For further information see Chapter 3 of Sexual Harassment in the Workplace: A Code of Practice for Employers .

Employers may limit their liability if they can show that they took all reasonable steps to prevent the sexual harassment occurring. Reasonable steps may include policies and procedures designed to create a harassment-free environment. It could also include procedures to deal with allegations of discrimination made by employees or customers. To be effective, policies must be well implemented, including through the provision of ongoing training, communication and reinforcement.


complaint definition legal

moncler mens knit hat
moncler sale uk online
moncler discount new york
us digital millennium copyright act yahoo answers
moncler baby snowsuit uk Extortion Download article as a PDF

Extortion is the crime of obtaining money or property by threat to a victim's property or loved ones, intimidation, or false claim of a right.

What Is Extortion?

Most states define extortion as the gaining of property or money by almost any kind of force, or threat of 1) violence, 2) property damage, 3) harm to reputation, or 4) unfavorable government action. While usually viewed as a form of theft/larceny , extortion differs from robbery in that the threat in question does not pose an imminent physical danger to the victim.

Extortion is a felony in all states. Blackmail is a form of extortion in which the threat is to expose embarrassing and damaging information to family, friends, or the public. Inherent in this common form of extortion is the threat to expose the details of someone's private lives to the public unless money is exchanged.

Another common extortion crime is offering "protection" to a businessman to keep his business safe from burglary or vandalism. For example, Dan goes to Victor's place of business and demands monthly payment from Victor for the business's "protection" from vandalism and after-hours theft. Fearing that he or his business will suffer harm otherwise, Victor agrees to pay Dan.

Extortion can take place over the telephone, via mail, text, email or other computer or wireless communication. If any method of interstate commerce is used in the extortion, it can be a federal crime.

Extortion Statutes

Virtually all extortion statutes require that a threat must be made to the person or property of the victim. Threats to harm the victim's friends or relatives may also be included. It is not necessary for a threat to involve physical injury. It may be sufficient to threaten to accuse another person of a crime or to expose a secret that would result in public embarrassment or ridicule. The threat does not have to relate to an unlawful act.

Other types of threats sufficient to constitute extortion include those to harm the victim's business and those to either testify against the victim or withhold testimony necessary to his or her defense or claim in an administrative proceeding or a lawsuit. Many statutes also provide that any threat to harm another person in his or her career or reputation is extortion.

Cyber Extortion: A Growing Threat

While you believe that extortion only happens in smoky back rooms or among shady Mafia characters, it can happen right here at your fingertips. Cyber extortion, a new way for criminals to take hold of your property, is on the rise in a modern society. Cyber criminals use a tool known as " ransomware ," to encrypt a user’s important files and documents, making them unreadable, until a ransom is paid. No specific business or individual appears to be the target, but cyber criminals tend to focus their efforts on against larger-scale targets such as corporations with large amounts of data and deeper pockets. 

Get a Free Case Evaluation with a Local Criminal Defense Lawyer

If you're having heated discussions with a business associate, a client, a friend or a family member and your words might be taken as a threat to gain money or other advantage, then the police could arrest you and charge you with extortion. If you're facing criminal investigation, your best move is to immediately get a free case review from a criminal defense attorney to better understand your situation and your options.





Fourth, two of the legal issues Bacon alleges that the trial court did not allow him "to litigate" before the trial court are the alleged speedy trial rights violation and refusal to hold a second preliminary hearing on the amended complaint. Nevertheless, as already explained, both of these issues are devoid of merit. Accordingly, Bacon did not suffer prejudice by the trial court's "refusal to hear" these issues.

Fifth, as with his prior claims, none of Bacon's arguments speak to the trial court's actual findings concerning why there was little risk of prejudice. Again, the trial court found that the prejudice factor weighed against Bacon because he had always been represented by counsel, had been given a preliminary hearing, had known that the trial was set for a long time, and had seemingly intentionally retained private counsel close to his firm trial date to manipulate the efficient administration of justice. It is an undisputed fact that Bacon had always been represented by counsel, had a preliminary hearing, and had known that the trial was set for a long time. Moreover, given the late date of Swain's hiring in conjunction with Bacon's recent dissatisfaction with a plea deal, one could reasonably conclude that Bacon retained counsel to manipulate the efficient administration of justice. Certainly, because Bacon makes no arguments specifically regarding why the trial court's actual findings about him not being prejudiced by the denial of the continuance were errant, we determine that the trial court's findings were reasonable.

Did Cumulative Error Prevent Bacon From Receiving a Fair Trial?

Bacon's final argument on appeal is that if this court finds the trial court's errors individually harmless, this court should still reverse his conviction because those errors were not harmless when considered cumulatively.
43 When reviewing a cumulative error challenge, this court must consider whether the totality of the circumstances establish that the defendant was prejudiced by cumulative errors and therefore denied a fair trial. State v. Holt, 300 Kan. 985, 1007, 336 P.3d 312 (2014). Cumulative error analysis requires this court to consider the errors in the context of the record as a whole. Holt, 300 Kan. at 1007. "Cumulative error, however, 'will not be found when the record fails to support the errors raised on appeal by the defendant.'" State v. Marshall, 303 Kan. 438, 451, 362 P.3d 587 (2015) (quoting State v. Cofield, 288 Kan. 367, 378, 203 P.3d 1261 [2009]).

Outcome: Here, Bacon has failed to establish that the trial court committed any errors. Because Bacon has failed to establish that the trial court committed any errors, cumulative error necessarily cannot exist. Thus, we reject Bacon's cumulative error argument.

Affirmed.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



    Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement © 1996-2017 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.